API & Systems Integration
Connect your CRM, ERP, accounting, store and payment systems so data moves on its own, mapped in writing, retried safely and monitored.
10 services
Describe the problem in plain words. We'll point you to the right starting point, even when that isn't us.
Consulting from $1,900 · Development from $2,500
Compare all servicesSoftware Development · Service 03
Automate the re-keying, chasing and copying that eats your team's week, with clear rules, a queue for the exceptions and a log of every step.
What this service is
Copying, re-keying, chasing and checking: if the steps are the same every time, a person shouldn't be doing them by hand. Your team's attention belongs on the cases that need judgment.
Workflow automation hands the repetitive, rule-based parts of a process to software: moving data between systems, routing requests for approval, generating documents, sending reminders and running month-end routines. We start by timing the work as it happens today, so you know which steps are worth automating and how many hours each one costs.
Not every workflow needs custom code. If Zapier, Make or Power Automate can do the job cleanly at your volumes, we'll say so and set it up properly. We build custom automation when the rules get complicated, the data is sensitive, failures are expensive or per-task pricing starts to outgrow the value. Either way, anything the rules can't decide goes to a person, and every automated step is logged.
Problems we solve
Automation is worth a serious look if your team's week includes any of these.
What you get
Not every engagement includes every item. Your proposal lists exactly what's in scope, and what isn't.
Each step of the current process mapped and timed with the people who do it, so effort goes where the hours really are.
Every trigger, condition, routing rule and exception written in plain language and signed off by the process owner before the build.
A straight comparison of Zapier, Make, Power Automate and custom code for your workflows, covering cost at your volumes, limits and risks.
Requests routed by amount, department, region or any rule you define, with delegation, reminders and escalation built in.
Quotes, contracts, invoices and letters produced as PDF or Word files from approved templates, filed automatically and sent for e-signature where needed.
A shared work list where anything the rules can't decide waits for a person, with the context needed to resolve it and a record of the outcome.
Nightly syncs, month-end routines and reminders by email, Slack or Microsoft Teams, each one monitored and alerting on failure.
A permanent log of every automated action and decision, plus a before-and-after report on hours saved, measured against the original time study.
Visual model
How the pieces typically fit together on this kind of engagement.
Common use cases
Practical patterns rather than industry labels. The shape of the problem matters more than the sector.
Supplier invoices captured from email, matched to purchase orders, routed by amount and cost center, and posted to Xero or QuickBooks once approved.
One HR record triggers accounts, equipment requests, contracts for signature and training, and access is removed on the last day.
Won deals in your CRM become orders, fulfillment tasks and invoices, without anyone retyping a line item.
Proposals, engagement letters and contracts built from deal data and approved clauses, sent for e-signature and filed in the right folder.
Figures pulled from several systems on a schedule, checked and assembled into the same report every month, ready before the team logs in.
Missing documents, overdue payments and expiring certificates chased on a schedule, with reminders stopping as soon as the item arrives.
Our approach
The parts of our method that matter most for workflow automation.
We time each step with the people who do it. If a task takes ten minutes a month, automating it probably isn't worth the cost, and we'll say so.
If Zapier, Make or Power Automate handles the job within its limits, that's what we'll recommend. Custom code is for the workflows those tools can't run safely or affordably.
Missing fields, duplicates and unusual amounts all get a defined path. When the rules can't decide, a person does, with the context in front of them.
Each automation runs in parallel with the manual process first, so you can compare results before anyone stops doing the work by hand.
After go-live we time the same steps again and report the difference, including anything that improved less than expected.
Project stages
Each stage has a defined output and a review point, so you always know where the work stands.
How our process worksProcess walkthroughs, a time study of each manual step and a ranked list of what's worth automating first.
Triggers, routing, exceptions and notifications written up and signed off, with a build-or-buy recommendation and a fixed quote.
Workflows built and tested against real past cases, including the awkward ones that usually get handled from memory.
The automation runs alongside the manual process, and the two sets of results are compared until they match.
Manual steps retired, the team trained on the exception queue, and monitoring and failure alerts switched on.
A follow-up time study and savings report, then rule tuning based on what lands in the exception queue.
Capabilities
Only the capabilities that matter for this service, and nothing we wouldn't actually recommend.
Delivery and engagement
Timelines depend on the number of systems involved, the quality of their APIs, how many exceptions the rules must handle and how long the parallel run needs to be. Every proposal includes a dated schedule.
Who it's for
We work with companies, organizations and individuals. The requirement matters more than the size of the buyer.
Related services
Connect your CRM, ERP, accounting, store and payment systems so data moves on its own, mapped in writing, retried safely and monitored.
Purpose-built applications that model your real operation (your data, your rules, your terminology), owned outright by you.
Find out where the working day really goes, remove the steps that don't need to exist, then choose changes and tools people will actually use.
Service FAQ
Often you should, and if so we'll set it up properly. Those tools are a good fit for straightforward workflows between popular apps at moderate volumes. Custom automation makes sense when the logic is complex, per-task pricing gets expensive at your volumes, data can't pass through a third-party platform, or a failure needs careful handling. Using both side by side is a perfectly sensible outcome.
Before we build anything, we time each manual step with the people who do it and count how often it happens. After go-live, we measure the same steps again. The savings report shows the difference step by step, including any that didn't improve as much as expected.
It stops and asks. Anything outside the rules, such as a missing field, an unusual amount or a supplier it doesn't recognize, goes to the exception queue with the details attached, and the right person is notified. Nothing is guessed, and nothing disappears silently.
They will, and the system expects it. Thresholds, approvers and recipients live in settings your team can change without a developer. Changes to the logic itself go through version control and testing, so you can always see which rules applied on any given date.
One well-defined workflow: a single trigger, a handful of rules, up to two connected systems with usable APIs, notifications and a simple exception queue. More systems, multi-level approvals, document generation and longer parallel runs add to the scope, and you'll see a fixed quote before you commit. If a no-code tool would serve you for less, we'll recommend that instead.
Final pricing depends on the number of workflows and systems, the complexity of the rules, document generation needs and the length of the parallel run. You'll receive a fixed quote against a written scope before any commitment.
Tell us what you're trying to achieve. We'll come back with a clear view of the scope, the approach and the cost, and if we're not the right fit, we'll say so quickly.